Skip to content
Md. Aslam Beg Akash
All research

Manuscript in Preparation

Bimaterial Bouligand structures

Target Journal: Composite Structures · Planned Submission: Early November 2026

A rotating stack of stiff and compliant layers

The effects of rotating stiff PLA and compliant TPU layers on load-bearing capacity and deformation were investigated through mechanical testing and finite element analysis. The study examines how this architecture influences strength, energy absorption, and damage development under tensile and bending loads.

Overview of the architecture, experiments and computational study. Performance gains shown are relative to the 0°/90° control; the tensile simulation agreement includes calibration.

Why a Bouligand architecture

Inspired by the rotating layers of biological protective structures, the Bouligand architecture introduces small changes in direction between successive layers. This gradual rotation distributes load-bearing paths and helps spread local damage through the stack. The smallest pitch tested gave the highest bending strain energy density and tensile toughness among the Bouligand configurations, alongside sustained deformation.

The focus of this work is the combination of helicoidal orientation with alternating, discrete PLA and TPU layers. Stiff PLA provides mechanical resistance, while compliant TPU accommodates deformation between neighboring layers. Evaluating this combination under both tension and bending shows how material contrast and layer orientation work together to balance strength and toughness.

Biological inspiration and printed architectures. (a) Peacock mantis shrimp; (b) dactyl club cross-section; (c) Cotinis mutabilis beetle; (d) beetle cuticle micrograph; (e) Japanese beetle; (f) striped bass; (g) exoskeleton schematic; (h) PLA/TPU filament analogues. (i–k) B5, B10 and B15 architectures with 5°, 10° and 15° pitch angles. (l–n) Conventional 0°/90°, 90°/0° and +45°/−45° controls. Light layers are PLA; red layers are TPU.

Computational Investigation

An Abaqus finite element model was developed with 19 separate layers representing alternating stiff PLA and compliant TPU. Material assignments and PLA orientation-dependent behavior captured the contrast between neighboring layers. The model closely reproduced bending stiffness and peak strength; following calibration, tensile predictions also agreed with the measured stiffness and peak strength. The analysis describes the mechanical response up to peak loading, while the fracture images illustrate the experimentally observed damage.

Fracture Behavior under Bending and Tension

Under bending, progressive cracking and layer separation developed around the damaged regions, while TPU connections helped maintain deformation after localized PLA fracture. Under tension, PLA fractures occurred at different positions through the laminate, with compliant TPU layers bridging the resulting openings. These observations illustrate how alternating stiff and compliant layers accommodate damage under different loading conditions.

Bending — Experimental Fracture Morphologies
Tension — Experimental Fracture Morphologies

My contribution

← Back to researchRelated calculations ↗